• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Global Patent Research and Alerts | Pearson Strategy Group, LLC

Helping businesses look before they leap. - TM

  • HOW WE HELP
    • Patent Searches
      • Innovation Strategy
      • Patent Analytics
    • Patent Searches for Patent Attorneys
    • Keep Up with Your Industry and Competition
      • Patent Alerts
        • Live Alert Demonstrations
          • Additive Manufacturing – Recent Patents and Applications Alert
          • Aerial Drones (UAVs) – Recent Patents and Applications Alert
          • Blockchain – Recent Patents and Applications Alert
      • Recognize Your Threats, Opportunities
        • Adjacent Technology Example
        • Emerging Technology Example
        • Disruptive Technology Example
      • Competitive Intelligence
      • Custom Market Research
    • Additional Support
      • Frequently Asked Questions
  • ABOUT US
    • Meet the Founder
    • Alliance Partners
    • Philosophy
    • Trusted Suppliers
  • SUCCESS STORIES
  • CONTACT
  • NEWSLETTER SIGN-UP
  • BLOG
  • Search

Advice to Samsung: Proactive research better than playing catch-up with Apple, and about $1 billion cheaper

Samsung Galaxy Internal View

The recent California Court decision to award Apple $1 billion in damages for patent infringement has major implications for every player in the smart phone industry. I think a proactive approach to monitoring patent research would have changed the outcome for Samsung and teaches an important lesson.

A presentation by William N. Hulsey III, Esquire (www.HULSEYIPLaw.com) shows specific patent claims in the case and the reasons behind the jury’s decision.

Mr. Hulsey pointed out that the most incriminating evidence was a “highly confidential” Samsung document http://www.bgr.com/2012/08/08/apple-samsung-patent-lawsuit-internal-report-copy-iphone/) that was a feature by feature comparison of Samsung’s Galaxy smart phone against Apple’s iPhone. The key takeaway was that Samsung’s phone needed to be more like the iPhone.

On a marketing level, I give credit to Samsung for creating a comprehensive document comparing their product to their chief rival. However, by using existing products they demonstrated that they were years behind Apple’s significant lead.

They should have been more proactive by keeping track of Apple’s new features from prior products as well as the progressive technologies, patents and designs introduced by Apple as well as other companies in this area.

Had Samsung kept track of Apple’s patent applications and granted patents as they were published, Samsung would have had a much earlier insight into those technologies, Apple’s future direction(s) as well as what technologies they should avoid replicating due to patent protections.

On a tactical level, my recommendation to Samsung would have been to include covered patents for each feature in the document. This would have helped raise red flags to competitive obstacles.

Given a choice between imitation and innovation, Samsung chose to imitate the inventive market leader, Apple. Their poor execution of this strategy doomed them to losing in court.

 

Graphic credit:

Vera de Kok (Wikimedia)

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)

Reader Interactions

Leave a Comment Cancel

sidebar

Blog Sidebar

Subscribe to Our Newsletter Overview of Our Services Schedule a Consultation

Recent Posts

  • Intellectual Property Strategy for SaaS Startups
  • How to Confidently Decide Between a Provisional and Non-Provisional Patent Application for Your Invention
  • Summer 2021 Newsletter from Steve Pearson
  • How to Leverage the Amazon Brand Registry
  • Approaching Patent Valuations, Common Methods and Qualifications of Analysts
  • Understanding Patents and the Need for Valuation: The Basics
  • Summer 2020 Newsletter

Footer

Let’s Talk

What to expect. Sample reports. Pricing.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Recent News

Andrew Rapacke

Intellectual Property Strategy for SaaS Startups

From Steve: Please welcome returning guest blogger Andrew Rapacke. Andrew is the managing partner at The Rapacke Law Group, a full-service intellectual property law firm. Andrew’s post examines several important topics software companies need to Read More

Randi Karpinia

How to Confidently Decide Between a Provisional and Non-Provisional Patent Application for Your Invention

From Steve: This Guest blog by Randi L. Karpinia, esq. covers what could be the most common inventor question. Randi Karpinia, author of Sagacity Legal’s “The Legal Blog”, helps small businesses and entrepreneurs minimize their legal risks. Read More

Social Media

TwitterYoutubeLinkedin

Phone: 1-512-466-1450 | Email: innovate@pearsonstrategy.com

© 2022 Pearson Strategy Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved