• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Global Patent Research and Alerts | Pearson Strategy Group, LLC

Helping businesses look before they leap. - TM

  • HOW WE HELP
    • Overview of Services
    • Patent Searches
      • Innovation Strategy
      • Patent Analytics
    • Patent Searches for Patent Attorneys
    • Keep Up with Your Industry and Competition
      • Patent Alerts
        • Live Alert Demonstrations
          • Additive Manufacturing – Recent Patents and Applications Alert
          • Aerial Drones (UAVs) – Recent Patents and Applications Alert
          • Blockchain – Recent Patents and Applications Alert
      • Recognize Your Threats, Opportunities
        • Adjacent Technology Example
        • Emerging Technology Example
        • Disruptive Technology Example
      • Competitive Intelligence
      • Custom Market Research
    • Additional Support
      • Frequently Asked Questions
  • ABOUT
    • About Us
    • Meet the Founder
    • Alliance Partners
    • Philosophy
    • Trusted Suppliers
  • SUCCESS STORIES
  • CONTACT
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
  • NEWSLETTER
  • BLOG
  • Search

Stop the Music! I Just Realized Innovation isn’t Always the Best Business Move

SXSW Musings on When NOT to Innovate

Microphone on audio mixer

Along with about 200,000 other music lovers, I enjoyed SXSW’s recent descent on Austin and the chance to take in some live performances. But, I think it is safe to say that I was one of the few fans making mental connections between the music industry and its love-hate relationship with innovation.

This line of thought bubbled up during a great performance that included my daughter’s guitar instructor (Van Wilks from here in Austin and highly recommended!) which we caught shortly after I researched my blog post SXSW Exclusive: Top 10 Inventive Companies in Musical Technology.

As we watched the performance from fantastic seating at the side of the stage, I thought about all of the wiring and equipment on the stage and how big a trip hazard it presented. (Please don’t tell my wife, she already thinks I’m a geek.)

And then it hit me…

Some markets, and the industries that serve them, deliberately avoid innovation, at least in the equipment used. While this is not bad or detrimental, I never really thought about it as being pervasive in any particular industry. Wow! As someone who helps inventors, entrepreneurs and companies be more innovative, this notion that someone would prefer not to be innovative seemed foreign, the horror!

My earlier blog post research revealed that this hesitance is not universal. In fact, I discovered that Yamaha is a huge exception and trying to be very innovative in the music industry. This contrasts with other well-known companies such as Moog that are highly respected and are likely to be so for many more years by producing the same equipment that made them famous.

How can innovation and lack of innovation flourish side-by-side in the same industry?

As an electrical engineer I respect that the sound produced by digital electronics has less noise than that of older analog equipment. I thought it was so cool when audio CDs first came out (I won’t tell you what year!) since their sound was very clean. I didn’t realize until later that these low-noise tracks were sacrificing bass, a key benefit of analog systems using vacuum tubes.

I also didn’t realize until a few years ago that some people *prefer* hearing the noise and popping associated with records and vacuum tube equipment. This concept was hilariously captured in an episode of the TV show Everybody Loves Raymond, a small portion of which can be seen here.

This might help explain why people have saved the vinyl record from obsolesce and are even finding ways to introduce that sound to other formats too.

We in technology (notice how I drag everybody under the bus with me) often focus on delivering better equipment. There’s certainly nothing wrong with this goal unless you consider that we’re often doing this on the basis of specifications, especially in comparison to other equipment. Unfortunately, we occasionally forget to find out first what people prefer.

A current example of how we’re trying to “catch up” the state of music equipment is the release of newer music formats such as Pono and others. The big benefit here is to move us closer to a live performance and improve on the lower audio quality formats such as MP3.

At the same time, incoming college students were found to prefer the “sizzle sounds” of MP3s. [1] Compared to the analog technology, is this starting to sound like a familiar story of generational preference?

Now that I’ve ranted, what other markets exist that prefer not to change? Do they fall into a similar pattern as the music equipment industry?

 

Picture credit: Ekaphon maneechot (Shutterstock)

[1] The Sizzling Sound of Music, Dale Dougherty (2009)

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)

Reader Interactions

Leave a Comment Cancel

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comments

  1. Nancy Harkrider says

    June 26, 2015 at 4:11 pm

    Steve,

    I so much appreciate a technologist who regularly thinks out of the box. The question you asked is very relevant. We humans too often jump into change-infused innovation without considering the problem we are attempting to solve. I have discovered in my professional and personal life that sometimes the most innovative action we can take is to question the need for star-spangled innovation.

    Reply
  2. Steve Pearson says

    September 18, 2016 at 6:20 am

    Here’s the results of some related audio research by the Centre for Digital Music at Queen Mary University of London that was published after this blog was posted: http://electronics360.globalspec.com/article/6972/high-resolution-audio-you-can-hear-me-now
    Steve

    Reply

sidebar

Blog Sidebar

Subscribe to Our Newsletter Overview of Our Services Schedule a Consultation

Recent Posts

  • Intellectual Property Strategy for SaaS Startups
  • How to Confidently Decide Between a Provisional and Non-Provisional Patent Application for Your Invention
  • Summer 2021 Newsletter from Steve Pearson
  • How to Leverage the Amazon Brand Registry
  • Approaching Patent Valuations, Common Methods and Qualifications of Analysts
  • Understanding Patents and the Need for Valuation: The Basics
  • Summer 2020 Newsletter

Footer

Let’s Talk

What to expect. Sample reports. Pricing.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Recent News

Andrew Rapacke

Intellectual Property Strategy for SaaS Startups

From Steve: Please welcome returning guest blogger Andrew Rapacke. Andrew is the managing partner at The Rapacke Law Group, a full-service intellectual property law firm. Andrew’s post examines several important topics software companies need to Read More

Randi Karpinia

How to Confidently Decide Between a Provisional and Non-Provisional Patent Application for Your Invention

From Steve: This Guest blog by Randi L. Karpinia, esq. covers what could be the most common inventor question. Randi Karpinia, author of Sagacity Legal’s “The Legal Blog”, helps small businesses and entrepreneurs minimize their legal risks. Read More

Social Media

TwitterYoutubeLinkedin


Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions

Phone: 1-512-466-1450 | Email: innovate@pearsonstrategy.com

© 2023 Pearson Strategy Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved